Some days I wonder what today’s Yeshua movement would be like if Saul, the persecutor Rabbi hadn’t fallen off his Damascus Road donkey. Suppose the Jewish scholar-policeman had just ‘pulled himself together’ and spurred his trusty ass on towards another religious roundup; how would the Way, later to morph into Christianity, appear in 2013? Call me strange but this somewhat unsettling quirky, what if thinking seems to be part of my Irish psycho-spiritual makeup, so please bear with me!
Many today believe the true Gospel or Good News to be the pure revelation of God as expounded in the writings of Saul. Their reasoning goes something like this:
Yeshua came to teach the Kingdom of God, it was largely rejected by his listeners, and so God and he switched to plan B, that had really been plan A all along viz. his death and resurrection. So far so good to a point. In the early days of the embryonic, Jerusalem, Yeshua community it would appear that his followers, including his ex-disciples didn’t get it quite right! Except for Stephen that is for he, like Yeshua before him, drew the mob violence of the religious establishment upon himself, becoming the first so-called Christian martyr, for only Truth tends to draw the raging genie out of a highly polished sacred lamp.
Yet, the reasoning goes that God still hadn’t got His perfect message out! Even though the Jerusalem gang had lived with Yeshua during his space-time mission and had been taught by him post resurrection over many days, a finer intellect was needed, one who would really get it.
And so we arrive at Saul, aka Paul and his stumbling attempts to understand the One who’d knocked him off his perch as Temple sponsored Inquisitor in Chief. The big transformation in Paul however took place somewhere else, one where most of his old religious paradigm seems to have rapidly gone down the metaphysical drain. This Pauline womb of creativity appears to have been the Arabian, or more accurately, the Jordanian desert, where the new convert claimed to have been caught up into the Jewish Third Heaven and granted unspeakable glimpses of Ultimate Reality. This is where Paul professed to have gained his insights into the whole Yeshua phenomenon, later described by him as my Gospel or Good News‘.
Later writing to his fellow Yeshua followers in Galatia, the new apostle claimed not to have received his teachings from Peter and his Jerusalem friends but directly from the risen Yeshua. Clearly then, the converted Rabbi was what is commonly called a mystic, one who receives direct revelation from Divine Source, rather than the status quo teaching of his contemporaries.
So what, if any, is the big problem?
Wasn’t Paul clearly sent along to lift the message of Yeshua and his former disciples to a whole new level, one that the Gentile would could accept without all those painful Jewish disciplines such as circumcision? Let’s face it; which of us men wouldn’t have signed up to be a Paulian?
Well, looking back at things from our 21st century perspective it’s hard to see the problems, but problems there certainly were once Paul added his mystical mix to the existing Yeshua mythology. Many of us have observed hints of the religious rivalry within the early Yeshua movement as described in the book of Acts, a Pauline stream account of the tensions between his followers and the fledgling movement’s elder statesmen back in Jerusalem with their particularly Jewish take on their risen leader. Let’s be honest: there must be a wee bit of Pauline propaganda in Luke’s Acts narrative; no-one writes to paint their charismatic leader as a ‘heretic’ but rather the bearer of a superior revelation, one that surpasses the previously accepted take on spiritual reality. Paul, In reality Paul was only one among many interpreters of the whole Yeshua event, those who jostled for the label of God sanctioned teacher. The early Yeshua movement was I’m afraid, not one big happy family but a collage of metaphysical takes on the revolutionary Nazarene, one with it’s all too obvious tensions and rivalries.
Three centuries on the Pauline interpretation of Yeshua’s execution and resurrection were later confirmed by the Constantine instigated Counsel of Nicaea as Christian with letters accredited to his authorship later included in the accepted Canon of Holy Writings, known as the New Testament.
So what’s the big deal you say?
Well, may I humbly suggest that Paul’s writings have gained a super status position within Reformed Theology and its modern love children viz. evangelicalism and its Pentecostal and Charismatic offshoots; one that is, all things considered, spiritually unhealthy. Having been raised to the level of Sacred Scripture, Paul’s metaphysical musings infer that the Gospel narrative accounts of Yeshua’s life and teaching don’t quite reveal the Mysteries of the Cosmos. The Tao/Logos in human form did not fully reveal all that needed to be revealed. Neither in fact do the other relatively recently discovered accounts of the early Yeshua movement, in the form of the so-called ‘Gnostic Gospels’.
Am I suggesting that we shouldn’t read Paul’s or his disciples’ take on Yeshua. No not at all. There is clearly something rich and unique within his narratives that reflect the awe and wonder of the mystical Yeshua, the Cosmic Christ to borrow a New Age term. Rather, what I am suggesting is that we have ignored the Gospel narratives, both canonical and excluded, at our peril. Our spirituality has been based on Pauline interpretation, giving us a one-sided limp on our pilgrimage home. Personally I believe that all that we require to come into mimetic salvation with the Divine Source is contained hidden within the overly familiarized Yeshua accounts within the accepted Gospels.
May I humbly suggest that God didn’t grab Rabbi Saul to be ‘the’ authentic interpreter or indeed founder of ‘Christianity’, as many modern Yeshua followers subliminally believe, but to paint a uniquely colored stroke on the multifarious canvas of Divine Truth.
So let’s dip into the rich variety of religious writings that abound around the person of Yeshua rather than remain Paul freaks. To do so will make us more sensitive to our own inner Journey and that of those around us. Life, especially the spiritual life, is full of surprises.
Dylan’s Author page ~ https://www.amazon.com/author/dylanmorrison
First blog I have read. I have gone beyond what you call mystic. I would call myself a disciple walking in conscious messianic Sonship. For me John is the best Mystic. John in Bungay UK
Hi John.
Welcome to my blog and thanks for your comment.
Yes, beyond the initial mystical contact with Other is the resulting realization that somehow we too are part of the risen Sonship. As a panentheist I see myself as in union with or within the Divine but not identical to it.
🙂 Dylan
Hi Dylan – as professional New Testament scholar, I can’t agree with very much you’ve said here. Paul’s take on the Messiah event was not “metaphysical”. It was a thoroughly Jewish understanding, in line with his tradition and, actually, very much in line with Jesus’s own Jewish understanding of his life and mission. Paul may have (but not necessarily) have re-worked some of his (Jewish) theology during his time in Arabia – but the major factor in this is not some form of mysticism, but rather his reading of his ancestral texts. Paul is supremely a reader of Jewish scripture. Any attempt to read Paul in a philosophical manner or in any other way as thoroughly Jewish I’m afraid will not stand the test of the NT texts. Attempts to drive a wedge between Paul and Jesus simply do not understand Jewish theology in the 1st century. For an excellent recent exploration of all this I’d refer you to J R Daniel Kirk’s Jesus I Have Loved, But Paul? Worth reading. Best regards 🙂
Hi Gary
Thanks for dropping by. I appreciate your professional Reformed theological input. Clearly as a new Testament scholar you have access to more scholarly information than I presently have; yet I still reckon that Paul’s claimed visit to the Third Heaven wasn’t a reading of his ancestral texts but a real live mystical experience. I guess that most theologians nor indeed Jewish Rabbi’s don’t get knocked off their asses by a blinding Light who informs them it is Jesus. Although clearly a theologian of a certain Rabbinical School, I believe that Paul’s spiritual experiences were beyond words, as he himself claimed. His interpretation of such experiences via the lens of his ancestral heritage was the best that he could do. Interestingly Aquinas, the prince of theologians stopped his theological speculations once he’d had a mystical experience whilst at the alter. “I can write no more,” he told his secretary, “for all that I have written seems like straw in comparison to what I have seen.”
The wedge that I see within the theological tradition is not necessarily one between Yeshua and Paul, but between Paul’s interpretation of the Yeshua event and that of his numerous contemporaries. It surely takes more than one man’s input and perspective to shed light on the Nazarene’s uniqueness in the world of spirituality. I guess that we could say that it takes a theologian to recognize a theologian and a mystic to recognize a mystic.
Blessings as always my old blues loving friend!
Dylan
Oi! Dylan; Thou art a supreme Sacred Cow Tipper indeed! Expect a barrage of flaming fundamentalist arrows! Yikes! Love the article!
Blessings!
~ Michael
Michael, I’m already safely entrenched in my mystical underground lair so hopefully not a problem!
🙂 Dylan
Dylan, I really enjoyed your post and concur with most of it. Evidence for this view is that for most evangelicals, their forumulas for salvation almost always come straight out of Paul’s letters (except for the born again verse). I suspect that most evangelicals would, if they could, rephrase Jesus’ Great Comission in Matthew 28 to have Jesus tells his disciples to relegate his own teachings to another dispensation and to wait for ol’ brother Paul to come along and lead them into all truth! 🙂
Blessings,
Bill
Like John, I too find John’s writings, particularly his first epistle a lot more ‘juicy’ than Pauls writings, although as you correctly point out, Paul interpreted his experiences and insights through his Jewish lens. Even Jesus whilest limited in in the flesh was very Jewish in certain respects, even though He found the actions and attitudes of the Jewish religious leaders abhorrant. John, having lived and experienced Jesus in the flesh and in mystical experiences doesn’t seem to have as much clutter, starting his adult life as a fisherman rather than religious acolyte.
Robin, I must admit that I too am a John fan. He seems to have a great balance between the mystical and the practical in much of his writing.Less of a systematic theologian that Paul, his writings are harder to manipulate for the building of religious empire methinks.
Thanks for dropping by!
Blessings
Dylan
Great post, Dylan! I am about to explore the role of Paul in my next blog post over at “The Shining Stranger.” The post on “Man’s Archaic Heritage” is the lead in for exploring Paul. I think you might enjoy the ride! http://shiningstranger.wordpress.com/
Hey Dylan,
I think that your view of Paul is fairly accurate and he would certainly agree that he was not the ‘superstar’ of Yeshua as he himself said that he was ‘the least of all the Apostles.’ I also believe that if he were to look at what many have done with his writings that he might well have considered ripping them up rather than allowing them to get into the hands of those who, today, abuse them.
The sad truth is that most are so focused trying to blindly obey the letter of the law that they fail to see the faith through the love that was intended. That being said, I do think that Paul had some thinking especially about Grace that we need to consider.
Do I think that one needs Paul’s writings to get to what Yeshua was saying? No. Do I think that they help? Yes.